Agentic OS

Cursor 被 SpaceX 買走了。六百億，15 倍營收，然後呢？

SpaceX 用 600 億美元買下了 Cursor，大約是它年收入的 15 倍，普遍認為是史上最大的 VC 新創收購案。這個倍數背後有個具體的賭法：AI coding 工具的乘數效應，讓你值得付出基礎建設等級的溢價。

Cursor Sold for $60B. What That Price Actually Signals.

SpaceX's $60B acquisition of Cursor isn't just M&A. At roughly 15x revenue for a four-year-old startup, the price encodes a specific thesis: that AI-assisted engineering compounds engineer output in a way worth paying an industrial premium for.

When an AI says "done," ask it to show you

An AI's 'done' sounds the same whether the work happened or not. The fix is one small habit: don't take its word for it, ask it to show you a result you can check yourself, sized to the task.

AI 說「完成了」，怎麼確認它真的做完？

AI 回報「完成了」的時候，真的做完、做一半繞過去、方向整個誤會，那段話讀起來幾乎一樣。與其判斷那句話可不可信，不如養成一個反射：給我看一個我自己查得到的東西，commit、測試輸出、diff。

怎麼讓 AI agent 照流程走:閘門只記帳,不攔人

流程裡那些閘門其實不在執行時擋住 AI agent,它要的是一張改不掉的收據。真正有牙齒的不是閘門,是記錄抹不掉、賴不掉。

Claude Code 多了個 dynamic workflows，我打開那段 JS 看了一下

Claude Code 5/28 釋出 dynamic workflows，跟 Opus 4.8 同一天上。比起「能開 1000 個 subagent」那個數字，更關鍵的是 orchestration 那段 JS 是 Claude 寫的、不是 Claude 在跑——這件事其實滿值得想一下的。

Agentic OS

See all 19

Cursor 被 SpaceX 買走了。六百億，15 倍營收，然後呢？

Cursor Sold for $60B. What That Price Actually Signals.

When an AI says "done," ask it to show you

An AI's 'done' sounds the same whether the work happened or not. The fix is one small habit: don't take its word for it, ask it to show you a result you can check yourself, sized to the task.

AI 說「完成了」，怎麼確認它真的做完？

怎麼讓 AI agent 照流程走:閘門只記帳,不攔人

流程裡那些閘門其實不在執行時擋住 AI agent,它要的是一張改不掉的收據。真正有牙齒的不是閘門,是記錄抹不掉、賴不掉。

Claude Code 多了個 dynamic workflows，我打開那段 JS 看了一下

Claude Code

See all 11

When an AI says "done," ask it to show you

An AI's 'done' sounds the same whether the work happened or not. The fix is one small habit: don't take its word for it, ask it to show you a result you can check yourself, sized to the task.

AI 說「完成了」，怎麼確認它真的做完？

Claude Code 多了個 dynamic workflows，我打開那段 JS 看了一下

How Claude Code's Dynamic Workflows Run 1,000 Subagents

Claude Code's new dynamic workflows hand the orchestration plan over to a JavaScript script that Claude writes. The runtime executes it with up to 1,000 subagents — 16 concurrent — and Claude's context only sees the final cross-checked answer.

怎麼寫你的第一個 skill — 從一個煩躁的 prompt 開始

你的第一個 skill 不會長得像書裡那些 production-grade 的成熟形態,它會長得像「你重複打三次的同一個 prompt」。從那裡開始,比從一個成熟框架的 skill 倒著學容易很多。

13 行的 skill:AI 起稿,我事後才看懂

我請 AI 幫我寫一個能從 Claude Code 呼叫 Codex CLI 的 skill,它給我 13 行 markdown。13 行很小,但 skill 跟 prompt 真正的差別不在這 13 行裡——在它指過去的那一份東西裡。

Architecture

See all 10

Cursor 被 SpaceX 買走了。六百億，15 倍營收，然後呢？

Cursor Sold for $60B. What That Price Actually Signals.

怎麼讓 AI agent 照流程走:閘門只記帳,不攔人

流程裡那些閘門其實不在執行時擋住 AI agent,它要的是一張改不掉的收據。真正有牙齒的不是閘門,是記錄抹不掉、賴不掉。

Claude Code 多了個 dynamic workflows，我打開那段 JS 看了一下

How Claude Code's Dynamic Workflows Run 1,000 Subagents

怎麼寫你的第一個 skill — 從一個煩躁的 prompt 開始

Governance

See all 10

When an AI says "done," ask it to show you

An AI's 'done' sounds the same whether the work happened or not. The fix is one small habit: don't take its word for it, ask it to show you a result you can check yourself, sized to the task.

AI 說「完成了」，怎麼確認它真的做完？

怎麼讓 AI agent 照流程走:閘門只記帳,不攔人

流程裡那些閘門其實不在執行時擋住 AI agent,它要的是一張改不掉的收據。真正有牙齒的不是閘門,是記錄抹不掉、賴不掉。

Token 成本的真相:分級,但別分太細

把 token 當設計變數而非月底帳單:粗放的任務成本沒有上限,但分太細也不會更省。快取讓過度切分反而更貴,重點是找到對的顆粒度。

Token Economics of AI Agent Governance

Governance has a bounded, knowable token cost; ungoverned agent work tends not to. And task granularity has its own price: caching can make over-decomposition cost more than it looks.

No evidence, no completion

No evidence, no completion: the one rule that closes most AI agent failures. A task isn't done until it produces a verifiable artifact (commit SHA, test output).

Skills

LLM

Dev Tools

Cursor 被 SpaceX 買走了。六百億，15 倍營收，然後呢？